Monday, May 11, 2009

Characters of the Decade - Part One: The Top 5 Reinterpreted Characters in English-Language Drama This Decade.

Each month, I will be unrolling a top 10 list regarding English-language drama this decade. Last month, I revealed the best lines from English-language plays this decade [Part One] [Part Two] [Part Three]. This month, I will be unveiling the best characters to emerge in Engish-language drama this decade. Because of the complications of such a list; I have broken it into three categories
  1. Original Characters
  2. Historical Characters (a.k.a. characters based on real life people)
  3. Reinterpreted characters: Characters Who Are Fictional But Have Appeared in Other Plays or Media Previously.
On Monday, we begin with the Top 5 Reinterpreted Characters in English-Language Drama This Decade.

5. Peter (Peter and Jerry, Edward Albee)
Edward Albee solves some unfinished business in his sequel to his 1958 classic Zoo Story—giving a character the chance to explain himself that Albee fans had craved for half a century.

4. Eurydice (Eurydice, Sarah Ruhl) Greek mythical heroes are being updated all the time, but by turning Eurydice into a sweet girl who’s tragic trait is being “interesting” is particularly inspired, especially since Ruhl manages to avoid getting too fey.

3. Moritz Stiefel (Spring Awakening, book & lyrics by Steven Sater) The character once deemed to disturbing to even touch the Fringes of New York theater became the decade’s biggest icon for depressed teenagers in American theater.

2. Franz Liebkind (The Producers, book by Mel Brooks and Thomas Meehan) Brad Oscar may never escape the life he gave to this character, but his performance and Brooks and Meehan’s reinterpretation may have been the only character to literally cause attendees to roll in the aisles on an almost nightly basis.

1. Aunt Esther (King Hedley II & Gem of the Ocean, August Wilson) Posthumously, we can look at August Wilson Pittsburgh Cycle in the fictional order; in real life we watched the death of the spiritual center of his body of work in his most obtusely tragic work; her role as one of the most crucial characters in African-American literature was sealed by her origin story seen just a few years later on Broadway.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, April 08, 2009

The Top 10 Quotes from English-language Drama This Decade: 10-6

Unless some new play ends up sweeping me off my feet in the next few months that I didn’t see coming, I think we can safely begin to wrap up the debate on the progress in drama in the English language for the first decade of the 21st century. Say what you will about the crisis facing the commercial theater in terms of profitability, but in terms of quality, there were a hell of a lot of good plays this decade. Some of these plays are as good as those from the golden age of Braodway; it would be a shame if they don’t become as much a part of our culture as Tennessee Williams, Arthur Miller, or Harold Pinter. I doubt that, in 40 years, I will see some future soul child of The Simpsons do to August: Osage County what The Simpsons did to A Streeetcar Named Desire, but then again, I always seem to underestimate the role of theater in American cultural life. There may be far fewer Americans, or even New Yorkers, who are aware of the works of Sarah Ruhl, Sarah Kane, Adam Rapp, Mike Daisey or Taylor Mac, but if a play makes a big enough dent on the Broadway or even high off-Broadway level, it can be seen by enough people to make a difference.

Each month, I will be unrolling a top 10 list regarding English-language drama this decade. This first month starts with the best lines from English-language plays this decade. I have admittedly taken a more mainstream angle on this list, because my aim is to gauge which lines will resonate the loudest for the longest period of time in the future.

10.

“Not many people know this, but the Führer was descended from a long line of English qveens.” – Franz Liebkind (played by Brad Oscar), The Producers, book by Mel Brooks and Thomas Meehan.

When Mel Brooks came up with this line, he caused co-writer Thomas Meehan to fall out of his chair laughing. He did the same to thousands of audience members of the biggest flash-in-the-pan Broadway success this decade. The line was vintage Mel Brooks, but its particular application to the musical conversion of Brooks’ first feature film was a key element of the play’s wild success. With this line, Brooks completely lightened the load of Nazi imagery that dominated the rest of the play, and validated Brooks’ controversial assertion that it was more effective to demean Hitler through mockery as rather than polemics an hour before “Springtime for Hitler,” sausage display and all, hit the stage. It was also a nod to the homoerotic connotations inherent in staging a Broadway musical, no matter how straight you may be. That a right-wing Nazi could be so blind to the inherent gayness of staging a musical only made the wink to the audience that much stronger.

9.

“You the cowboys and I'm the Indians. See who wins this war.'' – Elder Joseph Barlow (Anthony Chisolm), Radio Golf by August Wilson.

Radio Golf was the weakest play of Wilson’s decade-by-decade 20th century saga, and that was mainly because the 1990s were no place to show off what made Wilson so great. Wilson’s mix of humor, poetry, folklore, playfulness, desperation and political rage made him the preeminent voice of African-American theater in the 20th century, and this line, delivered by the only character in Radio Golf who could have fit in the rest of Wilson’s canon, pretty much summed up all of that in sentence where all but two words have one syllable. Everything went awry in Radio Golf’s second act, both for the characters and the play itself. But with this doozy of an act-breaker, Wilson showed you that, even out of his element, he could still knock you out of the park.

8.

Jirous doesn’t care. He doesn’t care enough even to cut his hair. The policeman isn’t frightened by dissidents! Why should he be? Policemen love dissidents, like the Inquisition loved heretics. Heretics give meaning to the defenders of faith. Nobody cares more than a heretic. Your friend Havel cares so much he writes a long letter to Husák. It makes no odds whether it’s a love letter or a protest letter. It means they’re playing on the same board…But the Plastics don’t care at all. They’re unbribable.” – Jan (Rufus Sewell), Rock N Roll by Tom Stoppard


Later in his life, John Osborne would repeatedly express his disgust with the success of Tom Stoppard, who he considered “intellectual flatulence.” How surprised would the original Angry Young Man be, then, to see that Stoppard would come up with the best explanation of the Angry Young Man mentality by an English language dramatist this decade. Jan is no Jimmy Porter, he’s more a foolish young pup blinded by the transcendent power of music that he sees as conquering all politics, ideas, and words. It would all come crashing down for Jan, as it does for just about every Angry Young Man, but with Rock ‘N’ Roll, Stoppard showed he understood the mindset his detractors accused him of ignoring. Jan’s speech here has all the attitude of “I hope I die before I get old” with all the intelligence of “I’ll get on my knees and pray/ we don’t get fooled again.”

7.

“If you let a standing army stand too long...it will find something to do. – Mike Daisey, If You See Something, Say Something.

Mike Daisey’s legacy at this point is still tied to his immensely influential diatribe How Theater Failed America, but with this line, Daisey framed the dangers of the military-industrial complex in a succinct manner better than anyone, be it Eisenhower, Bill Hicks, or Naomi Klein. The first time Daisey used the line, he was describing the Cold War change in the Presidential cabinet from Secretary of War to Secretary of Defense, and the line served to show how the military-industrial complex has created a perpetual need for global conflict over the last 50 years. The second time he used it, he put the words in the mouth of George Washington, which added a universal element to Daisey’s view on history, politics, war, and even theater. Daisey validated that the problems that plague our world today are not that different from what they’ve ever been. That Daisey accomplished this without a proper script only makes this achievement that much more impressive.

6.

“Did I send you to the most expensive university in the world to teach you how to feel conflicted, or to learn how to manipulate great masses of people?” – Caldwell B. Cladwell (John Cullum) – Urinetown, book by Greg Kotis.

No other musical would open with the number “Too Much Exposition,” nor would any other musical end with the cry “Hail Malthus!” But no line in Urinetown captured the sick genius of Urinetown creators Kotis and Mark Hollman like Urine Good Company’s robber baron Cladwell, who used this line as a sick way of consoling his daughter. In one line, Kotis combined high-minded political philosophy with Borscht-belt sarcasm and a practicality that gave it special significance to everyone who wasted their private college liberal arts education on philosophy or theater. The ridiculous circumstances that led to this line within the structure of Urinetown are about as ridiculous as those that led Kotis to win a Tony for writing the line.

Stay tuned for Quotes 5-3, to be revealed tomorrow.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Too Much News: Links of the Moment

There's only so much time to post links, so here's the storys that have been getting my attention lately:
  • My first major 6th grade crush turned Scientology robot Katie Holmes is headed to Broadway to star in All My Sons, in a role that awkwardly praises her legs. Sure enough, the YouTubes have already beat the future Joe Keller (John Lithgow) to it.
  • Mel Brooks hams it up for an interview with the Los Angeles Times in honor of Get Smart. Best line? "You're Greek, Andreas. We don't start sentences with 'or' in America."
  • While were on the topic of Mel Brooks, unless there was a Bialystock and Bloom-esque accounting scheme, those 23 year old Broadway starlets of Glory Days I blogged about have cost their producers several millions of dollars after a grand total of one performance before closing. They seem to be handling it in the manner I would: lounging about their apartments watching bad sitcom reruns
  • Theater people are doing what they do best—being dramatic—over this year's Drama Desk awards. The domination of Broadway in this years awards has led to resignations, accusations, counter-accusations, and counter-counter accusations. I lost track of all the complaints by the second paragraph, but it seems the primary complaint was removing someone from an email list in a fit of anger. Leave it to theater people to see having less email clutter as a source of outrage.
  • Michael Feingold at The Village Voice has an excellent article on the resurgence of the musical in recent years. No snarky remark here, just damn good commentary to be found
  • Finally, The Guardian has a post up on the theatricality of Barack Obama's speechmaking, echoing W.J.T Mitchell's commentary in my Theories of Media class this winter. Sometimes I wonder if I would be supporting Obama as strongly if I hadn't seem his 2004 Democratic Convention speech live, but based on my demographics, it'd be a miracle if I wasn't an Obama supporter anyway.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

The rise and fall of Mel Brooks

Mel Brooks has gone through many stages of his career, from TV genius to film schlockmeister to mastermind behind one of the great musicals of the past decade. In the two former fields, he faced an embarrassing decline, and, sadly, it's looking like the same is now happening to Mel Brooks the Tony-winner. After the overwhelmingly negative response to the Young Frankenstein musical, Brooks is increasingly sounding like a bumbling old man with his own reasoning behind the critical thrashing: that critics are mad about the $450 premier seats, and in making this claim he passes the buck to co-producer Robert F.X. Sillerman.
"This was set by the producer who was too ambitious and thought the extra money might go to our backers and cast rather than concierges, scalpers and ticket brokers," Mel said.
Michael Riedel of the New York Post, never one to pass on a verbal beating, lets Mel Brooks have it for blaming Sillerman for a problem that is clearly Brooks' fault, and sadly, I'm inclined to agree.

To be fair, I haven't seen Young Frankenstein (nor do I have any real desire to do so), but I wasn't surprised when it failed. The Producers succeeded mainly because on its unflinching love for Broadway tradition. Young Frankenstein was Mel Brooks best movie for similar reasons, in that it was a love letter to classic film like The Producers was a love letter to Broadway. Frankly, I don't know that many people who had high hopes for Young Frankenstein.

But to remind us all of Mel Brooks' better musical days, I humbly submit this clip:

Labels: , , , ,